![]() |
Clinical Image
1 University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
2 McLeod Digestive Health Center, Florence, South Carolina, USA
Address correspondence to:
Ryan Alexander
University of South Carolina School of Medicine, MD Candidate, Class of 2021, 6311 Garners Ferry Rd, Columbia, South Carolina 29209,
USA
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 100080Z08RA2021
No Abstract
Keywords: Gellhorn pessary, Rectovaginal fistula, Uterine prolapse
A 74-year-old woman with history of stage I uterine prolapse with daily Gellhorn pessary use for 12 years and constipation with weekly suppository use presented with 7 days of stool on her pessary. Physical examination revealed an afebrile female with a benign abdomen and stool at the vaginal introitus. Laboratory examination revealed a normal white blood cells (WBC) count, and a urinalysis with positive leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and white and red blood cells. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated contrast in the rectal vault and at the level of the vaginal introitus as well as distal colonic diverticula (Figure 1). Colonoscopy findings are given in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4. During colonoscopy, the scope passed through the anterior rectal wall through a tract into the vagina and out to the bed (Figure 2). A 2 cm opening on the anterior rectal wall (red arrows, Figure 3) and a mature fistula tract (Figure 4) with granulation tissue (blue arrows) were visualized. The opening was treated with argon plasma coagulation and an over-the-scope-clip was placed. This resulted in >90% improvement in patients’ symptoms immediately and allowed for hospital discharge.
Female bowel-vaginal fistulas can be subclassified as anovaginal fistulas (AVFs) if they occur below the dentate line and true rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) if cephalad to the dentate line. Bowel-vaginal fistulas most frequently result from obstetric trauma, especially after repair of third- or fourth-degree laceration of the perineum or following hysterectomy. Other etiologies include Crohn’s disease, radiation, diverticulitis, colon cancer, or fecal impaction. Additionally, treatment options for pelvic organ prolapse including cube pessaries and mesh repair procedures have been associated with RVFs [1].
Gellhorn pessaries are generally used for advanced stage III and VI pelvic organ prolapse. Current recommendations are pessary fitting with follow-up within 2–4 weeks to reassess fit [2]. If possible, instruction on removal and care should be provided. Women are advised to remove the pessary once a week and wash with water or mild soapy water or follow up with their provider at 3-month intervals for pessary care. Intervals for pessary replacements vary greatly and are often based on manufacturer’s recommendations. Higher complication rates have been reported for 6-month replacement interval over 3-month [3]. Long-term pessary use may lead to vaginal erosions and ulcerations, which places the patient at higher risk for development of a fistula.
This case highlights the serious complications of repeated pessary use and the importance of repeat examination and patient education regarding pessary care.
1.
Torbey MJ. Large rectovaginal fistula due to a cube pessary despite routine follow-up; but what is ‘routine’? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40(11):2162–5. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Robert M, Schulz JA, Harvey MA; Urogynaecology Committee. Technical update on pessary use. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013;35(7):664–74. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
3.
Tam M, Lee VYT, Yu ELM, et al. The effect of time interval of vaginal ring pessary replacement for pelvic organ prolapse on complications and patient satisfaction: A randomised controlled trial. Maturitas 2019;128:29–35. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
Ryan Alexander - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Davinderbir S Pannu - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Guaranter of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2021 Ryan Alexander et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.