Case Report


Sonidegib: Real-life experience with Hedgehog inhibitor for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma

Alessia Dottore1
,  
Roberta Briguglio1
,  
Domenico Priolo1
,  
Francesco Ferraù1

1 Unità Operativa Complessa Oncologia, Ospedale “S. Vincenzo”, Taormina (ME), Sicily, Italy

Address correspondence to:

Alessia Dottore

Alessia Dottore, Unità Operativa Complessa Oncologia, Ospedale “S. Vincenzo”, Taormina (ME), Sicily,

Italy

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

Article ID: 100134Z10AD2024

doi: 10.5348/100134Z10AD2024CR

How to cite this article

Dottore A, Briguglio R, Priolo D, Ferraù F. Sonidegib: Real-life experience with Hedgehog inhibitor for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. J Case Rep Images Oncology 2024;10(2):6–9.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sonidegib, a Hedgehog inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), reported an objective response rate of 60.6% (central review) and 74.2% (investigator review) and a median duration of response of 26.1 months in the pivotal trial BOLT. The therapy showed an excellent tolerability profile. The most frequent adverse events are muscle spasms, dysgeusia, alopecia, nausea, increased creatine kinase, weight loss and fatigue.

Case Report: This article reports the case of a neglected patient in which sonidegib rapidly led to an important tumor mass reduction and improvement of quality of life without of adverse effects.

Conclusion: The peculiar efficacy and tolerability of sonidegib, in addition to representing a current gold standard for the treatment of the advanced disease, allow us to hypothesize its use on a larger scale in a modern multidisciplinary strategy (delete with surgery and radiotherapy).

Keywords: Basal cell carcinoma, Real-life experience, Sonidegib

Introduction


Sonidegib, a Hedgehog Inhibitor (HHI) approved for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), reported an objective response rate of 60.6% (central review) and 74.2% (investigator review) and a median duration of response of 26.1 months in the pivotal trial BOLT [1]. The therapy showed an excellent tolerability profile. The most frequent adverse events are muscle spasms, dysgeusia, alopecia, nausea, increased creatine kinase, weight loss and fatigue.

Case Report


We present a case report of a 69-year-old woman with a social isolation and rejection of medical treatment, with past medical history of anxiety and depression.

Her story began with a recurrent lesion in the upper right eyelid that was misdiagnosed and surgically treated as a chalazion. Photographic documentation, provided by her caregiver in June 2020, showed a large lesion affecting the right eyelid and the base of the nose. At that time, the patient refused any diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

In December 2020, the patient showed a very extensive lesion (delete dome-shaped) measuring 12 × 5 cm in diameter that affected the right orbit, majority of the forehead and nose, and reaching to the left orbit. The mass presented ulceration and neovascularization. Due to pain and general malaise, the patient finally accepted to undergo head and maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scan that showed wide destruction of the surrounding tissues, including bone structures of nose, right jaw, right orbit, anterior cranial fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, and right infratemporal fossa (Figure 1).

In March 2021, the patient reported for the first time to our center with intense pain and swelling in the right half of the face, diffuse rachialgia, and difficult walking. The mass showed further enlargement with a bleeding ulcer at the base (Figure 2); therefore, the patient allowed a biopsy that confirmed an infiltrating scleroderma-like BCC with baso-squamous features. Since the size and location of the lesion and the concrete risk of hemorrhagic and neurological consequences made any loco-regional approach unfeasible (surgery or radiotherapy), Hedgehog inhibitor therapy was recommended. Sonidegib 200 mg orally once daily was prescribed.

Sonidegib was well tolerated and led to reduction of pain, burning and itching from the first days of treatment. After only 37 days of therapy, the lesion was significantly reduced in size and flattened (Figure 3). In subsequent weeks, there was a constant progressive reduction of the tumor mass. After four months of therapy the lesion was flat (Figure 4) and, as shown on head and maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scan (Figure 5), the process of destruction of surrounding tissues stopped almost completely.

Figure 1: Head and maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scan before the start of sonidegib therapy.
Figure 2: Before the start of sonidegib therapy.
Figure 3: 37 days after the start of sonidegib therapy.
Figure 4: Four months after the start of sonidegib therapy.
Figure 5: Head and maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scan after four months the start of sonidegib therapy.

Discussion


The management of the patient with BCC that cannot be controlled with surgery and/or radiotherapy has seen in recent years a profound shift allowed by the significant results of medical therapy with Hedgehog inhibitors. Sonidegib combined the brilliant cytoreductive activity and an optimal tolerability (as reported in BOLT trial [2]). Our case report show a time to response lower than time to response in the BOLT trial. This “speeds” of response to treatment.

This “speeds” of response to treatment can be found in many case reports reported in the literature [3],[4],[5]. The good tolerability is of particular importance for this subset of patients: they are often elderly and with important comorbidities. In case of adverse events, it’s possible the switch to alternating daily administration (200 mg every other day) before to consider stop treatment. Moreover, sonidegib is for oral use: the patient takes the drug at home without the need to go to hospital. In our case, it’s relevant to highlight that sonidegib had the ability to rescue a neglected patient who had previously refused any other type of therapeutic intervention, allowing her to resume social life and significantly improving quality of life. Finally, it is worthy of note that sonidegib was effective on a BCC with baso-squamous features, as recently reported also by Toffoli et al. [6].

Conclusion


In conclusion, the peculiar efficacy and tolerability of sonidegib, in addition to representing a current gold standard for the treatment of the advanced disease, allow us to hypothesize its use on a larger scale in a modern multidisciplinary strategy.

REFERENCES


1.

Gutzmer R, Robert C, Loquai C, et al. Assessment of various efficacy outcomes using ERIVANCE-like criteria in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib: Results from a preplanned sensitivity analysis. BMC Cancer 2021;21(1):1244. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Dummer R, Guminski A, Gutzmer R, et al. The 12-month analysis from Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 Treatment (BOLT): A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of sonidegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;75(1):113–25.e5. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Trabelsi S, Khidher F. Rapid onset of response to sonidegib for multiple facial basal cell carcinomas during COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther 2022;35(4):e15317. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

4.

Tarantino V, Zavattaro E, Veronese F, Gironi LC, Savoia P. Rapid and exceptional response to sonidegib in a patient with multiple locally advanced basal cell carcinomas. Anticancer Drugs 2021;32(4):465–68. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Dummer R, Guminksi A, Gutzmer R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: 42-month analysis of the phase II randomized, double-blind BOLT study. Br J Dermatol 2020;182(6):1369–78. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Toffoli L, Agozzino M, di Meo N, Zalaudek I, Conforti C. Locally advanced basosquamous carcinoma: Our experience with sonidegib. Dermatol Ther 2022;35(6):e15436. [CrossRef] [Pubmed] Back to citation no. 1  

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Author Contributions

Alessia Dottore - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Roberta Briguglio - Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Domenico Priolo - Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Francesco Ferraù - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Consent For Publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Competing Interests

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2024 Alessia Dottore et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.